Garfinkel, T., Rosenblum, M.: A virtual machine introspection based architecture for intrusion detection. Įlhage, N.: Much ado about null: Exploiting a kernel null dereference. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium, p. ACM (2010)Ĭhen, S., Xu, J., Sezer, E.C., Gauriar, P., Iyer, R.K.: Non-control-data attacks are realistic threats. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), pp. IEEE Computer Society (2010)Ĭheckoway, S., Davi, L., Dmitrienko, A., Sadeghi, A.-R., Shacham, H., Winandy, M.: Return-oriented programming without returns. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO), pp. ACM (2012)Ĭaulfield, A.M., De, A., Coburn, J., Mollow, T.I., Gupta, R.K., Swanson, S.: Moneta: a high-performance storage array architecture for next-generation, non-volatile memories. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), pp. ACM (2006)īianchi, A., Shoshitaishvili, Y., Kruegel, C., Vigna, G.: Blacksheep: detecting compromised hosts in homogeneous crowds. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), pp. IEEE (2007)īerger, Y., Wool, A., Yeredor, A.: Dictionary attacks using keyboard acoustic emanations. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. IEEE (2008)īaliga, A., Kamat, P., Iftode, L.: Lurking in the shadows: identifying systemic threats to kernel data. In: Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC), pp. USENIX Association (2011)īaliga, A., Ganapathy, V., Iftode, L.: Automatic inference and enforcement of kernel data structure invariants. In: Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Conference on Hot topics in Operating Systems (HotOS), pp. M.: Operating system implications of fast, cheap, non-volatile memory. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Ģ million facebook, gmail and twitter passwords stolen in massive hack (2013). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Our experimental results show that our defense is effective in detecting kernel data attack with negligible performance overhead. To counter against kernel data attack, by classifying kernel data into different categories and handling them separately, we propose a defense mechanism and evaluate its efficacy with real experiments. #BESIDES REIKEY KEYLOGGER CODE#Therefore, existing defense mechanisms including those deployed at hypervisor level that search for hidden processes/hidden modules, or monitor kernel code integrity, will not be able to detect DLOGGER. Instead of injecting any malicious code, it only alters kernel data and leverages existing benign kernel code to build a covert channel, through which attackers can steal sensitive information. Then, we further develop a new keylogger called DLOGGER, which is more stealthy than existing keyloggers. More specifically, by tampering with kernel data, we first demonstrate that attackers can stealthily subvert various kernel security mechanisms. In this paper, we thoroughly investigate kernel data attack, showing that its damage could be as serious as kernel rootkits, and then propose countermeasures. Intuitively, the security impact of such an attack seems minor, and thus, it has not yet drawn much attention from the security community. This type of attack is called kernel data attack. ReiKey also utilizes Sentry.io for crash detection which may generate network traffic related to (anonymized) error/crash reporting.Altering in-memory kernel data, attackers are able to manipulate the running behaviors of operating systems without injecting any malicious code. #BESIDES REIKEY KEYLOGGER UPDATE#Note that you can disable this automated update check via the application's preferences. No user or product information is collected nor transmitted. Specifically, it reads the file products.json, which contains the latest version number of ReiKey. #BESIDES REIKEY KEYLOGGER INSTALL#By design, ReiKey simply scans and alerts on programs that install CoreGraphics keyboard "event taps." While this is the most common technique (ab)used by macOS keyloggers, there are other techniques that malware may use to capture keystrokes.Ī: When ReiKey is started, it connects to to check if there is a new version of the product. Q: Scan ReiKey detect all macOS keyloggers?Ī: No. This is normal, and does not mean Apple is spying on you! Siri) sometimes install keyboard event taps in order to filter and/or listen to keypresses for benign reasons. Q: Why does ReiKey show detect various Apple/macOS binaries?Ī: If the "Ignore Apple Programs" preference is not selected, various system components and system applications may generate alerts or show up in a scan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |